test


Income support policy and poverty trends

Presentation to the Australian Social Policy Conference, September 2019, by Bruce Bradbury, Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Sydney: Income support policy and poverty trends in 21st century Australia


Shares of national wealth by wealth group

2015-16: The highest 20% of household wealth groups holds 62% of all wealth. The middle 20% wealth group holds 12%, and the lowest 20% wealth group holds less than 1%. Wealth is highly concentrated at the very top. The highest 10% wealth group owns 45% of all wealth while the highest 5% owns 32% and the very highest 1% holds 15%. So the share of the highest 1% (15%) is greater than the middle 20% (12%). This probably underestimates of the true extent of wealth inequality. The wealthiest 1%, who own a disproportionate share of all wealth, are a small number of people and so are underrepresented in household surveys. It is also likely that many under-report their wealth. In contrast, the combined wealth of the lowest 40% is just 6% of the total.

 

2017-18: The highest 20% of household wealth groups holds 61% of all wealth. The middle 20% wealth group holds 12%, and the lowest 20% wealth group holds less than 1%. Wealth is highly concentrated at the very top. The highest 10% wealth group owns 45% of all wealth while the highest 5% owns 32% and the very highest 1% holds 15%. So the share of the highest 1% (15%) is greater than the middle 20% (12%). This probably underestimates of the true extent of wealth inequality. The wealthiest 1%, who own a disproportionate share of all wealth, are a small number of people and so are underrepresented in household surveys. It is also likely that many under-report their wealth. In contrast, the combined wealth of the lowest 40% is just 6% of the total.


Share of people with different characteristics in the lowest and highest 20% income groups

The first half of this graph shows the share of each group of people with a particular characteristic who are in the lowest 20% income group of households.

Older people, single people and sole parents, and those who rely mainly on government income support payments are more likely to be in the lowest 20% income group.

The most important influence on incomes is labour force status. People living in households where the household reference person is not in the labour force or is unemployed are much more likely to be in the lowest 20% income group.

People living in Tasmania and South Australia are also more likely to be in lowest 20%, along with people living outside capital cities.

The second half of this graph shows that those more likely to be in the highest 20% income group are of working-age and in couple households without children (noting that income is adjusted to take account of the costs of children).

People employed fulltime are more likely to be in the highest 20%, along with those whose main income comes from investments. People living in Sydney, Perth, the ACT or NT are also more likely to be in the highest 20%.


Average household incomes for different income groups

This table shows the average income of households in Australia, split by groups of 20% by income; as well as the highest and lowest 10% and 5% income groups.

2017-18: Somebody in the highest 20% group lives in a household with over twice the average weekly disposable income of the middle 20% ($4,166 per week compared with $1,884), and five times as much disposable income of a household in the lowest 20% ($753 per week). The average income of the middle 20% ($1,884a week) is two and half times that of the lowest 20% ($753). Income is heavily concentrated at the top: average income in the highest 5% (at $5,796) is more than one-and-a-half times the average of the highest 20%.

2015-16: This shows that somebody in the highest 20% group lived in a household with over twice the average weekly disposable income of the middle 20% ($3,978 per week compared with $1,779), and five times as much disposable income of a household in the lowest 20% ($735 per week). The average income of the middle 20% ($1,779 a week) was two and half times that of the lowest 20% ($735). Income is heavily concentrated at the top: average income in the highest 5% (at $6,063) was more than one-and-a-half times the average of the highest 20%, and the average of the top 1% (at $11,682) was almost three times that of the highest 20%. The average disposable income of the highest 1% ($11,682 per week) was more than 26 times that of the bottom 5% ($436). This means that the highest 1% received as much income after tax in a fortnight as the lowest 5% received in a year.


Average weekly disposable income

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:



Poverty in Australia: A national perspective

Presentation to the 2019 NTCOSS conference by Jacqueline Phillips, Director of Policy and Advocacy, ACOSS: Poverty in Australia_A national perspective