Back to overview

Demographic distribution of community attitudes towards “Incomes at the top are too high”

Income inequalityPovertyInequality

This chart shows the demographic distribution of responses in our Community attitudes towards poverty and inequality survey to the phrase incomes at the top are too high.

 

  • By age: Agreement increased markedly by age group, from 57% (aged 18 to 30) to 84% (aged 68 and above).
  • By gender: Agreement was largely consistent between women (67%) and men (68%).
  • By income: Differences varied when compared by income, with people in the second income quintile agreeing most (75%) and people in the third (middle) income quintile agreeing least (64%).
  • By income support payment: People in the lowest income quintile who were receiving the age pension agreed most (82%), compared with those receiving parenting payments (45%), or carer, JobSeeker and disability payments (58–72%).
  • By employment status: People who had retired agreed most (81%) and people who were not employed agreed least (61%).
  • By income source: People who had investment or other main income sources agreed most (75%) and people who were self-employed agreed least (61%).
  • By housing status: Homeowners without a mortgage agreed most (77%) and people who were not a homeowner or tenant (i.e., had ‘other’ housing arrangements) agreed least (54%).
  • By location: People from Western Australia agreed most (75%) and people from South Australia agreed least (65%).
  • By voting preference: People who voted for an independent agreed most (82%) and people who did note vote agreed least (56%).
  • By electorate: Agreement was typically consistent by party affiliation of elected parliamentary representative (68–72%)

 

Privacy Preference Center